Multiculturalism Results In Conflict. A Call For All of Humanity To Return To Sovereign/Bordered Ethno-States (i.e., Nation-States).

.
SYNOPSIS: Many people who promote multiracial & multicultural societies often mean well in that they feel they're creating a more peaceful world.  But they ignore the lessons of history and thus are laying the seeds for unimaginable future conflict and bloodshed.

Multiculturalism within a nation leads to internal tension and eventual violent conflict... 6,000 years of human warfare/conflict proves this (i.e., roughly 85% of all wars throughout recorded history are entirely rooted in racial/ethnic/religious conflict; the other 15% are purely ideologically-based). All races and ethnic groups are "tribal" & separatist in nature - these innate characteristics of human nature must be accepted and public policy should be implemented with such characteristics in mind. Hence, racial/ethnic homogeneity should be encouraged by public policy makers in each country. Pursuing racial/ethnic homogeneity in each country is the most humane way to organize the world's various peoples.  The Nation-State remains the true foundation for happiness and harmony.

Any realistic humanitarian (such as myself) understands this reality of human nature and works within its framework.

I don't have anything against Mexicans.... in Mexico. I don't have anything against Nigerians... in Nigeria. Mexicans should remain in Mexico. Nigerians should remain in Nigeria... and so on. Further, I hope Mexicans, Nigerians and all peoples of the world live healthy and productive lives in their respective countries. I do not wish ill or misfortune on any peoples in the world.

The next point I will make is a central concern of all people on the political far-right. As established by the United Nations Charter in 1945, each people/ethnicity/racial group should have their own geographic area on Earth (i.e., a bordered country) in which to exercise their right to self-determination as a unique people/ethnicity/racial group. The UN essentially follows this policy for nearly all non-White peoples of the world. However, the UN pressures White nations to maintain (and even increase) their multiracial/multicultural policies. The UN essentially demands that White nations continue allowing millions of non-Whites to immigrate into White nations. Is this a double standard? Of course.

Whites make up a mere 13% of the world's population and this percentage is shrinking with each passing year. White nations are under attack ---> a rapidly increasing rate of attack which is often called demographic warfare on the West (i.e., radical demographic change via massive non-White immigration into the Western World). At current 3rd world immigration rates into White nations, White people will become a minority in each White nation by 2028. And by 2043, Whites will make up 20% - 25% of each (historical) White nation.

The White Western World is gradually being erased - and - once the West is gone... its gone forever. Approximately 3,500 years of Western Civilization is on schedule to be reduced to scattered pieces.  Shockingly, this epic and colossal transformation will have occurred in a mere 100 - 125 years. It began in the 1950's and will likely be complete around 2050 - 2075 ... unless something can stop the global elite from carrying out the West's destruction (and yes... without a doubt... it is the global elite who are orchestrating the West's demise - the reason has to do with the global elites push for global government).

Just ponder this for a moment: a White baby born today will witness a future France where only 20% - 25% of France is White.  And Sweden?  Same story.  Italy? Same story.  And it'll be the same in America, Canada, Greece, Germany, Holland, Australia, New Zealand... every single Western nation.  No Western nation is immune.

Many liberals and leftists actually relish in the ongoing destruction of White Western Civilization.  These people, even if they are White themselves, absolutely hate the West and White people... they especially hate White men.  They've been indoctrinated with violent contempt toward all things Western and White.  They blame Whites for every problem in the world.  Such liberals actually believe that when Whites are eventually eliminated or at least reduced to far below 50% in the West, the world can then 'finally' be reconstructed into a peaceful egalitarian Marxist utopia.  Such liberals single out Whites even though every race has (since the dawn of time) engaged in war, conquest, enslavement, and so forth.  Brutality is, unfortunately, a characteristic of humans of every race, not just Whites.

Such White-hating liberals & leftists ignore the monumental accomplishments of the White race.  With regard to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine, Whites have contributed more to the world than every other race combined.  Despite this, Whites are being demographically crushed in their own nations.  This can only be called one thing: the ongoing genocide of the White race.  Listed in this video are some White accomplishments... accomplishments which benefit all of global humanity of every race...



Some people have dismissed my concerns by saying, "every country has immigration, you're singling out White countries to make it look like they're being targeted" or they say, "human migration is part of history, get used to it."  First, as to the latter, "human migration is part of history...".  Yes, indeed it is.  But it's necessary to focus on recorded history (i.e., roughly the past 4,500 years).  Thus we should only consider the world beginning (more or less) with the formation of the Nation-State.  Human migration which occurred many millennia ago is irrelevant and those who include ancient human migration patterns into this debate are generally (and often intentionally) trying to confuse the ill informed, or, they naively bought into the feel-good slogan, "there is only one race, the human race" in an attempt to gloss over measurable biological differences between the world's various races and ethnic groups.

As to the first comment I often hear (i.e., "every country has immigration, you're singling out White countries...").  I say to them, yes, indeed, many countries have an immigration policy.  However, such policies are restricted to, 1) a handful of diplomats and their families, 2) a few rare cases of political asylum, and 3) perhaps even a small guest worker program which is carefully monitored to ensure the workers return to their home country upon completion of work.  Only White Western countries have official immigration polices which result in the racial/ethnic demographic transformation of entire cities and eventually their entire nation.  Can you identify a single non-White country which has a similar immigration policy (again, a policy resulting in massive racial/ethnic demographic transformation of that country)?  There isn't one.  Only White nations are de facto committing demographic suicide via endless 3rd world immigration.

The multiculturalizing of the Western World began shortly after World War II.  Each White Western nation adopted a primarily non-White, 3rd world immigration policy; this legislative process began in 1954 and was complete by 1972 (see this article, point #12).  Initially, only a trickle of non-White immigrants were allowed in.  But within a few years the quotas were increased and have accelerated ever since.  Within the next 40 - 50 years, the White Western World will essentially be erased from the Earth, never to come back.  And not through guns, bombs, and great armies.  But rather by way of massive immigration, mostly from the 3rd world.  This is called "demographic warfare" - it is... for all intents and purposes... the gradual conquering of White nations by flooding them with 3rd world immigrants.

Whites are intimidated into submission through politically correctness.  For decades Whites have been told to "be tolerant" because "diversity is our strength."  This liberal slogan is a huge lie; history proves its a lie.  The truth is that diversity is a cancer on any nation.  Racial/ethnic diversity within a Nation-State typically leads to tension, then conflict, which is often violent and bloody.

Whites who complain about 3rd world migrants are called "racists", "xenophobes", "haters", "bigots", "Islamophobes", etc.  Such outspoken Whites are often screamed at and shamed into submission, even though their country is being demographically transformed (and eventually erased) right before their eyes.  Sadly, some weak minded Whites would rather watch their country destroyed than be called a "racist."  However, the fact is that everyone regardless of their race is a racist... at least to some degree.  I'll say it again: every person is, to some degree, a racist (Black, White, Asian, Hispanic, etc).  I am a racist.  And so is everyone I know.  It's human nature to occasionally say or think racist things; every human being on Earth does.  And anyone who piously tells you, "Not me!!!  I'm absolutely NOT a racist!!!" ... well... they're lying.

Most liberals believe the feel-good slogan, "diversity is our strength" as gospel ... multiculturalism is like a religion to them.  On the other hand, the global elite who have been (for decades) orchestrating the destruction of Western Civilization, know that the slogan "diversity is our strength" is merely propaganda meant to deceive the general public.  The global elite have used the media & Hollywood to brainwash Whites into believing this propaganda.

A corollary to my Ethnic Nationalism worldview (also called ---> the advocacy of the Ethno-State concept for each and every distinct ethnic peoples on earth) is the following --> I'm 100% opposed to imperialism and empire building... either carried out by European-derived peoples or carried out by any peoples of any race/ethnicity. Further, as a person who is part of the political far-right (and like nearly everyone on the far-right), I have been against the U.S. led Middle East wars from day one. In short, the United States has no business being in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Global humanity works best when the world is divided into nation-states where each nation-state has racial/ethnic homogeneity (i.e., the Ethno-State concept). Nations can trade (i.e., fair trade, not so-called "free" trade), have diplomatic relations, compete in the Olympics, etc. And, of course, there should be tolerance between nations. However, when we start mixing VERY different peoples in the same country, what generally happens??? History tells us that trouble brews and internal violent conflict results - this is not a humane way to organize the world's peoples.

Global humanity has enough difficulty maintaining peace between nations. We don't need to make matters worse by creating, via official government policy, multiracial countries which ALWAYS gravitate towards internal conflict and violence (again, as history clearly illustrates).  Thus, pragmatic humanitarians (like myself) who are realistic about human nature, believe FIRMLY in racial/ethnic separatism (i.e., they believe FIRMLY in the Ethno-State for each distinct ethnic peoples). On the other hand, those pushing for multiculturalism are actually (unknowingly) anti-humanitarian.  Why?  Because they are (I'll say it again ---> unknowingly) laying the seeds for future internal national conflict (via their promotion of multicultural/multiracial nations) even though they naively think they are "building a better world."

The above is the core of my racial-realist/humanitarian philosophy.
.
aa