Immigration, Globalization, Political Correctness, & The Attack On The Western World

What Was The Holocaust... What Actually Happened?

2011-11-23T11:31:00.000-08:00

a
Over the past 20 years I have read - with a very open mind - roughly 40 books on the Holocaust. So just what exactly was the Holocaust? What happened during that period?

During World War II, Germany rounded up millions of civilians (both Jews and non-Jews) who could be potential saboteurs, belligerents, spies, messengers of the enemy, subversives, etc. Germany put them in camps whilst the war was going on. At the end of the war, Germany planned to move them elsewhere (assuming Germany had won WWII). With regard to the Jews, Hitler had considered moving them to Madagascar (yes, you read that correctly, Madagascar). With that said, and despite what Jewish dominated Hollywood has been peddling for the past several decades, there was never, I repeat never a plan to kill the Jews of Europe. Hitler's "Final Solution" was a plan to relocate Jews out of Europe - it was not a plan to "exterminate" them. This distinction cannot be emphasized enough.

As it turned out, the vast majority of such potential subversives were, in fact, Jews. Why? Because Jews were overwhelmingly leftist, Communist, Marxist, etc and thus many were naturally sympathetic to the USSR. For these reasons, Jews couldn't be trusted. Hence they were put in secured camps along with anyone, of any religion/creed/ethnicity/race/nationality, who may potentially engage in subversive activities. Homosexuals were put in not because they were homosexual but rather because homosexuals are almost universally, politically speaking, leftist. Thus homosexuals were put in the camps because of their subversive politics, not because of their sexuality.

Incidentally, the USA did the exact same thing with the Japanese and to a lesser extent German and Italian Americans. FDR put them in camps because they couldn't be trusted during the war (the U.S. was of course fighting against Japan, Germany, and Italy). Further, the practice of rounding up potential belligerents and holding them in camps is extremely common during war - you will find this to be true when studying the history of warfare: from the ancient Greeks, ancient Chinese - you name it - rounding up potential belligerents has always been a common practice during war, all throughout recorded history.

So what about all these Jews who allegedly died in and around the camps? Well, the majority who died did so in the final months of the war (perhaps 600,000 at most). In late 1944 and early 1945, the Allies were bombing Germany into the stone age. Roads, bridges, rail lines, etc were destroyed and hence Germany could no longer supply the various internment camps with food and medicine. The result? A lot of people died of disease and starvation both in the camps and all throughout Germany, including huge numbers of German civilians.

Regarding the gas chambers... yes, there were indeed gas chambers but they were used to disinfect the prisoners (and their clothes) as a measure to prevent typhus from spreading. Zyklon-B was the chemical used for this purpose; it was the standard disinfectant chemical used in Europe at that time. Jews have manipulated this in claiming the, "Nazis gassed 6 million Jews to death." Absolute nonsense. There is no evidence of this, none. What tourists are shown at Auschwitz is easily refuted. For example, the lone "gas chamber" at Auschwitz (shown to tourists) was built by the Soviets after the war for propaganda purposes; the Polish government has acknowledged this (Auschwitz is in Poland, not Germany).

Regarding the Eastern Front, it is indeed true that many Jews were killed there. After Germany invaded the USSR in June 1941, they encountered, in addition to the Soviet troops, tens of thousands of partisan fighters, mostly Jewish. In response to this, Germany created the Einsatzgruppen which was tasked with finding these partisans and capturing and/or killing them. Thus, these were not "innocent Jews" in the context of war, they were Soviet supporters (i.e., partisans) engaging in guerrilla warfare against the German troops.

That's what happened. That's the truth about the Holocaust.

But Jews have grossly exaggerated the Jewish death toll (they claim 6 million) and turned the Holocaust (as they call it) into a marketing tool - selling to the public "Jewish victimhood" which garners world Jewry tremendous sympathy. Any Psychologist will tell you that people who are viewed as "victims" tend to get away with more than others. The Holocaust is essentially a psychological weapon which targets the Western World. In particular, it is implicitly used as an excuse for Jews to commit horrendous crimes against the Palestinians and also engage in warmongering against many Muslim countries.

Here we see this technique in action. The President of Israel pushing for war with Iran in order to, "prevent another Holocaust":

How do Jews get away with perpetuating this lie? They control Western mainstream media - this is their main weapon. What people see on TV and in films - and read in popular publications - contributes 95% to how they perceive matters of politics and history. On extremely rare occasion, a story exposing Jewish lies will "slip through the cracks" and be shown on mainstream media, as we see in the following. Incidentally, the editor at Good Morning America who allowed this piece to air was fired the next day:

There are thousands of researchers who have published hundreds of books and technical papers on the Holocaust. For those wanting to explore this topic, you may want to read:

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour by Carolyn Yeager

Auschwitz: Open Air Incinerations by Carlo Mattogno

Treblinka: Extermination Camp or Transit Camp? by Carlo Mattogno and Jurgen Graf

A Brief History of Forensic Examinations of Auschwitz by Germar Rudolf

Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the "Gas Chambers" of Auschwitz by Germar Rudolf

More Academic Books On The Holocaust:
The Barnes Review Books
.
.

If Hitler Won World War II We'd Have A Better, More Just World Today

2011-10-25T11:52:00.000-07:00

.
Legendary U.S. General George S. Patton realized late in the war that the United States fought the wrong country. Patton felt the U.S. should have sided with Germany to destroy Jewish Bolshevik/Communist USSR. This information comes from Patton's diary entries, letters he wrote to his wife, and comments he made to military officers and staff.

If Hitler had won World War II (and he would have had the U.S. and Britain allied with Germany against the USSR) we'd have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious.

Some examples of what would be different:

- No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people throughout its 70 year reign; to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn -- Hitler would have liberated Russia, though taking parts of Western Russia for lebensraum, "living space")
- No cold war (because, again, there would be no USSR)
- No Communist Eastern Europe, Iron Curtain, etc.
- No Red China and Mao's slaughter of 45 million Chinese (Mao was aided by the USSR, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)
- No Communist North Vietnam (Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)
- No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2 million Cambodians
- No North Korea which is, of course, Communist (the allies split Korea following WWII)
- No Communist Cuba
- No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's greatest anti-Communist)
- No Cultural Marxism or political correctness (these are social engineering "products" of the Jewish led and staffed think tank known as the Frankfurt School)
- Liberalism & Multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos (because no Jewish influence)
- No 3rd world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews are responsible for each Western nation's liberal immigration policy, most were orchestrated by the World Jewish Congress)
- No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)
- No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers & Jewish plaintiffs were the main challengers of obscenity laws under the guise of "Freedom of Speech")
- Prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called "separation of church and state", something that appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution)
- No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key drivers of radical feminism)
- No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA & the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians
- Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish homeland)

Many reading this will ask, "But what about the Holocaust?" The Holocaust is a gross exaggeration by International Jewry in order to create sympathy for Jews and thus help advance their agenda. It is also used as a political weapon to justify Israeli militarism against the Palestinians. Germany's Final Solution was a plan to remove Jews from Europe, not to kill them. During WWII, just as the U.S. couldn't trust Japanese people, thus causing FDR to round many of them up and place them in concentration camps, Hitler couldn't trust Jews since many of them were partisans sympathetic to the USSR and hence they aided the USSR in various subversive, anti-German activities. Therefore the Nazis rounded up Jews and placed them in concentration camps. Somewhere around one million Jews died during WWII (not six million) mostly due to disease and starvation in the final months of the war. Allied bombing of German occupied Europe destroyed many roads, rail lines, and bridges making it impossible for Germany to adequately supply the camps with food and medicine. The result is that many Jews died of starvation and disease. Lastly, there were no "gas chambers." Much has been written about this. To study this subject, read the research papers published by Germar Rudolf & Carlo Mattogno (there are many others as well).

It should also be noted that Hitler never wanted to "conquer the world." He simply wanted to safeguard Europe from nefarious Jewish influence and safeguard the world form usurious Jewish banking.

Sadly, FDR and Churchill were puppets of International Jewry and the rest is history, as they say. World War II was a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism -vs- Jewish Bolshevik Internationalism (Communism) -- and unfortunately International Jewry won.

Was World War II "the good war??" No, it was exactly the opposite. The Allied victory marked the beginning of the end of White Western Christian Civilization.
.

The Two Jewish-led Globalist Camps... In Competition For Global Control

2011-10-13T17:21:00.000-07:00

.
There are two distinct ideological globalist camps, both led by Jews -- each camp competes with the other for global control:

1) THE LIBERAL CAMP

2) THE NEOCON CAMP (the term "New World Order" generally refers to this globalist camp, and usually not the liberal camp)

It is critical to understand that each ideological camp was created, developed, and fine-tuned by Jewish intellectuals. Without Jewish intellectuals, there would be no radical liberal school of thought (Communism, Socialism, Trotskyism, and all their supporting submovements/ideas such as feminism, gay rights, political correctness, etc.). Similarly, without Jewish intellectuals, there wouldn't be a Neocon school of thought.

The liberal Jewish camp is primarily composed of Trotskyite Jews (or just very left leaning Jews, plus their Gentile followers) who want a borderless world with a global government based on the United Nations concept (or even the UN itself). These are the "do-gooders" who naively dream of a John Lennon "Imagine" type world. They feel they can "love their way" to global power (though they can become violent against anyone who opposes their worldview). In the 1960's they were called the "New Left" (e.g., Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Max Horkheimer, Saul Alinsky, etc).

The Neocon Jewish camp (plus their Gentile followers) also want a borderless world but with a global government revolving around a NY-DC-LONDON-JERUSALEM axis. These are the exploitative-type Jews, the Super-Elite, who want 95% of global wealth in their hands and the rest of humanity in a "global plantation" type condition. They feel they can bomb their way to global power. Incidentally, the cold war Gentile warriors (e.g., Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., etc) and their Jewish globalist handlers (e.g., Henry Kissinger, Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Milton Friedman, etc) fall in this camp.

Pick almost any influential globalist Jew and they'll rather neatly fit into either the liberal camp or the Neocon camp. However, it should be noted that occasionally you'll find a Jew who is primarily in the liberal camp but with one foot lightly in the Neocon/Zionist camp (out of "tribal" loyalty to Israel).

THE FOLLOWING ARE SOME GLOBALIST JEWS, ORGANIZATIONS, PUBLICATIONS, ETC SHOWING WHICH CAMP THEY FIT IN.
NOTE: Some people on this list are not Jews. However, they are often referred to as "Jew-think Gentiles", i.e., they subscribe to and advance the globalist Jewish agenda (knowingly or unknowingly).
NOTE: Many listed below are fully aware of the globalist agenda they are involved in. Others, however, are unaware and thus are simply "pawns", "tools", or "cogs in the machinery" of the globalist agenda they are (unknowingly) advancing.

LIBERAL JEWISH GLOBALIST CAMP (in no particular order)
Noam Chomsky
George Soros and his Open Society Institute
The radical elements of the Democratic Party (e.g., Dennis Kucinich, Bernie Sanders)
The Rockefeller Foundation
United Nations
Workers World
European Union
Any "Green" political party
Any Socialist, Marxist, Maoist, Leninist, Stalinist, Luxemburgist, Communist political party (of course)
Any radical "Progressive" organization
International Committee Against Racism (and any anti-racist organization)
Any anti-Fascist organization
Any anti-Nationalist organization (of course)
All Hollywood film and television studios
Media Education Foundation
Organizations fighting Global Warming (but only the higher ups in these organizations are aware of the globalist agenda, the rank-and-file are well-meaning tools)
Greenpeace (but only the higher ups in this organization are aware of the globalist agenda, the rank-and-file are well-meaning tools)
Sierra Club (but only the higher ups in this organization are aware of the globalist agenda, the rank-and-file are well-meaning tools)
Carnegie Endowment For International Peace
PBS (Public Broadcasting Service)
Michael Moore
Amy Goodman & the entire "Democracy Now!" lineup
HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society)
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch (and just about any human rights organization)
Norman Finkelstein (very critical of Israel, advocates for a borderless world, a lifelong Maoist)
Zbigniew Brzezinski
The Pope & much of the Vatican
The entire MSNBC lineup
ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) - American Trotskyite organization
UAF (Unite Against Fascism) - British Trotskyite organization funded in part by George Soros
J-Street (with a foot in the ZIONIST camp but not in a militant i.e., "Likud-type" or "Kadima-type" way)
CODEPINK (radical feminist organization in the mold of militant, Anarcho-Communist Jew Emma Goldman)
The Trilateral Commission (much debate surrounds the classification of this organization; I put it here)
L.A. Jews for Peace (each large city has a similar group)
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Foreign Policy (political journal/magazine)
Los Angeles Times
Ford Foundation
Tides Foundation (funded in part by Teresa Heinz-Kerry)
et al.

NEOCON JEWISH GLOBALIST CAMP (in no particular order)
Benjamin Netanyahu
Rothschild Family
Alan Dershowitz
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Most (or at least many) Clear Channel AM talk radio hosts
Bush Family
Dick Cheney
Thomas Friedman
The radical elements of the Republican Party (e.g., Newt Gingrich, John McCain)
Ann Coulter
The Weekly Standard (political magazine)
The Wall Street Journal
The Washington Times
Any publication by Rupert Murdoch
Foreign Affairs (political journal/magazine)
Freeman Center for Strategic Studies
JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs)
NATO
Pentagon
European Jewish Congress
Koch Brothers
Steven Spielberg
Rush Limbaugh
Ayn Rand (particularly her economic ideology)
Alan Greenspan
Ben Bernanke
Leo Strauss (known as the father of the Neocon movement)
Chaim Weizmann (key historical figure)
David Ben-Gurion (key historical figure)
AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)
CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
Hoover Institution
The CATO Institute
WTO (World Trade Organization) - the WTO facilitates tariff free trade, thus allowing for the use of wage-slave labor in the third world
NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA and all other "free" trade pacts (also called "Neoliberal" trade policies)
World Bank
IMF (International Monetary Fund)
AEI (American Enterprise Institute)
WJC (World Jewish Congress)
Simon Wiesenthal Center
The entire FOX News lineup
Pamela Geller
et al.

Lastly, to understand how the Neocon camp (often referred to as the "New World Order") uses the liberal globalist camp to carry out much of the necessary "trenchwork" for its NWO goals to be realized, please read the article below titled, "Anti-fascists Are VERY Useful To The New World Order."
.

What Is Fascism?

2011-09-05T09:44:00.001-07:00

.
Unfortunately, Fascism has an undeserved bad reputation. Regardless of this reputation, Fascism is a very sensible economic and social ideology. There are a few different "flavors" of Fascism, but basically they all come down to the following.

Fascism is an economic system in which a nation's government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation - this is the axiom which determines everything under Fascism.

In other words, the government asks, "Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?" If yes, it's approved. If no, it's not approved. When they ask, "Is it good?", they mean, "Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???" For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, "free" trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation's labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.

Fascism is based on free enterprise - but with constraints (the primary constraint being, "Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation?"). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed).

In a nutshell, Fascism basically tells entrepreneurs, "Go ahead and start a business, earn a lot of money, be successful, but don't produce any products or services which damage our nation and our nation's people... and make sure you treat your workers fair and pay them a living wage. If you don't do these things, we'll shut you down."

The above is the economic aspect of Fascism. There is also a cultural/social aspect to Fascism as well. Under Fascism, government plays a key role in monitoring: film, theatre, art, literature, music, education, etc in order to maintain a high moral standard, keep things clean and respectable, promote a strong sense of patriotism and honor, and prevent the dissemination of depraved filth which corrupts society.

With regard to political legislation introduced in a Fascist government, the same criteria is applied - "Will this proposed law benefit the nation as a whole and the people of our nation?"

A few other things to mention. Fascism encourages respect for the environment as Fascists understand that nature is the giver of life and thus must be preserved. Contrast this environmental view with that of Capitalism which too often takes the short term view with regard to resources and foolishly believes that pollution is a necessary byproduct of profit.

Also, under Fascism, if a person doesn't like things, he/she can leave the country. Contrast this with Communism where if you don't like things, you better keep your mouth shut. And, of course, there is no option to leave the country. You will submit or else be sent to a re-education camp where you'll be brainwashed to accept the Communist system. And if you still resist, you'll probably be killed. Again, there is no leaving. Submit or suffer the consequences.

Lastly, Fascism holds women in very high regard. Women are the carriers of new life. They are expected to be educated, worldly, and well read. Women are encouraged to pursue their interests and have a career but only if a career won't interfere with their family's needs; family comes first, always. Women are encouraged to be strong yet feminine.

In short, Fascism is a form of government & social system which authentically serves the interests of the people and nation as a whole.

In Germany, the former NSDAP (i.e., "Nazis") essentially followed the above described Fascist system.
a

Muhammad Ali Speaks Out Against Race Mixing & Integration

2011-05-07T16:21:00.000-07:00

.

.

Former Assistant Secretary Of Treasury Says, "Israel Owns The USA"

2010-06-06T09:26:00.000-07:00

.

.

Anti-fascists Are VERY Useful To The New World Order (which is why the NWO funds them)

2009-09-07T15:35:00.000-07:00

.
If you follow the money you'll find that large well organized militant leftist organizations, so-called "anti-fascist groups" (examples: ANSWER Coalition in the United States & UAF in Britain) are funded by New World Order/Global Government fronts such as the Ford Foundation. So then, what's the connection between the NWO and militant leftist (i.e., "anti-fascist") organizations?

Before I go any further let me state that most "anti-fascists" are generally seeking:
- Trotskyism (i.e., a borderless world based on global Marxism)
- Intermixing of all races in which everyone will supposedly have respect for one another and universal justice will prevail
- Destroying Nationalism by destroying the very concept of a nation-state (this is part of Trotskyism)

Of course such goals amount to college utopianism and can never be realized. However, in working towards such goals, anti-fascists do much of the "trenchwork" towards:
- breaking down national borders
- promoting massive non-white immigration into the Western world (which acts as a nation-wrecking force on the West)
- promoting multiculturalism (which eventually tears a nation apart from within)

Interestingly, these are the same broad goals of the NWO. Hence, the NWO uses radical leftists to do much of the trenchwork necessary for the NWO's future "global plantation". This is a key point for people on the right to understand.

But of course, anti-fascists have absolutely no idea they are simply useful idiots of the NWO. This is another key point to understand.

Anti-fascists are effective since they sincerely believe what they're doing is morally right. Their belief in their moral superiority is a powerful motivating force, propelling them to inflict much damage to society (in their quest to tear down the current order). They believe global justice will be realized when all nations are eliminated, all races live together, and similar utopian goals are realized. Of course this is the old communist trick they have fallen for. A trick? Yes, because as soon as such broad goals are realized or merely approached, the NWO hammer will come down hard and a "global plantation" run by tyranny will reign supreme (think Bolshevik Russia). At this point anti-fascists will wonder, "where is the utopia we worked for?"

This is the same tactic top-tier Marxists have been using for 100+ years.

The bottom line is that communism is a scam used by elites to gain absolute power. Never forget that.

Here's an example of typical anti-fascists - these being in Russia - though they're the same in every nation they operate.

a

I Am A Humanitarian Which Is Why I FIRMLY Believe In Racial Separation

2009-09-02T11:37:00.000-07:00

.
Multiculturalism within a nation leads to internal tension and eventual violent conflict... 6,000 years of human warfare proves this (i.e., roughly 80% of all wars throughout history are rooted in racial/ethnic/religious conflict). All races and ethnicities are "tribal" & separatist in nature - these innate characteristics of human nature must be accepted and public policy should be drafted with such characteristics in mind. Hence, racial/ethnic homogeneity should be encouraged by policy makers. Pursuing racial/ethnic homogeneity is the most humane way to organize the world's peoples.

Any realistic humanitarian (such as myself) understands this reality of human nature and works within its framework.

I don't have anything against Mexicans.... in Mexico. I don't have anything against Nigerians... in Nigeria. Mexicans belong in Mexico. Nigerians belong in Nigeria. And so on. Global humanity works best when the world is divided into nation-states where each nation-state has racial/ethnic homogeneity. Nations can trade (i.e., fair trade, not so-called "free" trade), have diplomatic relations, compete in the Olympics, etc. And, of course, there should be tolerance between nations. But... when we start mixing VERY different peoples in the same nation, what happens? Trouble brews and internal violent conflict results - this is not a humane way to organize the world's peoples. Global humanity has enough trouble maintaining peace between nations... we don't need to make matters worse by promoting multiracial nations which ALWAYS gravitate towards internal conflict. Hence, humanitarians (like myself) who are realistic about human nature believe FIRMLY in racial/ethnic separatism. On the other hand, those pushing for multiculturalism are actually anti-humanitarian since they are laying the seeds for future internal national conflict (via their promotion of multicultural/multiracial nations) even though they naively think they are "building a better world."

The above is the core of my racial-realist/humanitarian philosophy.
a
a

The Four Forces Pushing For War With Iran

2009-06-22T08:48:00.000-07:00

a
1 - ISRAEL AND AMERICAN POLITICIANS BOUGHT OFF BY THE ISRAEL LOBBY
The Israel Lobby (AIPAC) is working overtime to get naive Americans to fight another war on its behalf. Politicians who call Israel out (like Ron Paul) are accused of "anti-Semitism." Never forget that the Israel Lobby runs U.S. foreign policy.

2 - NEOCON GLOBAL IMPERIALISTS
The NEOCON goal is simply to expand the American empire. Controlling Iran is yet another step towards controlling the Middle East. Forty percent of the world's energy comes from Middle East oil. Thus if one can control the Middle East, one can control forty percent of the world's energy supply. Controlling Middle East oil means you can control much of the global economy.

3 - THE OIL LOBBY
There is big money to be made by tapping into Iran's MASSIVE crude oil reserves.

4 - MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX (i.e., war profiteers)
War is big business, very big. War profiteers simply accuse their critics of being "unpatriotic" and "standing in the way of freedom and democracy" (yaaaaawwwwwwnnnn).
.
.

Diversity Training Company Teaches Hatred Of Whites

2009-06-15T14:07:00.000-07:00

.
EdChange is a well-known diversity training company based in St. Paul, MN. They offer seminars and consulting "services" to schools and companies. In other words, they "explain" to white school administrators and white corporate managers how they are "evil", "racist", and "oppressive" towards minorities. Take a look at the EdChange website to get an idea of the Marxist, America hating, white hating nature of this radical leftist organization:
http://www.edchange.org/

The following page lists a few of the schools and companies which EdChange has indoctrinated:
http://www.edchange.org/consulting_clients.html

EdChange also sells a wide range of radical leftist & white hating T-shirts including these two imprinted with "Cracker" and "Honkey" (click for larger image)...

What would happen if a diversity training company (or any company) sold T-shirts imprinted with "Nigger", "Gook", or "Spic"? Naturally there would be a public outcry via the mainstream media. But when whites are mocked, the mainstream media is silent. Further, EdChange sells a wide range of other products imprinted with "Cracker" and "Honkey" (click on links)... everything from coffee mugs to baby clothes.

Here are two more examples of the type of derogatory T-shirts EdChange sells (click for larger image)...

The T-shirt "Whitey O. Pressor" is particularly disgusting. "Whitey" is an extremely offensive term, but to EdChange it's perfectly acceptable. This T-shirt further indoctrinates non-whites into hating white people by claiming --> WHITES = OPPRESSORS. Feel free to check out the other T-shirts EdChange sells, all of a radical leftist nature.
a
.
.

Suggestion To The ADL: Trademark Your Marketing Terms, Charge Useage Fees, And Make A Buck

2009-06-03T10:33:00.001-07:00

.

.

ACLU's Agenda ----> Pro-Mexican, Pro-Muslim, Anti-Family, Anti-White, Anti-America

2009-06-02T21:24:00.000-07:00

.
The ACLU's main goal is to gradually deconstruct the USA while ushering in radical Socialism. The ACLU doesn't care about Mexicans, they simply view Mexicans (and illegal aliens in general) as a destructive force within the United States. Anything that hurts the USA, the ACLU supports. Anything that damages the social fabric of America and thus weakens it, the ACLU supports. This is why the ACLU attacks the boy scouts as well as anything related to the nuclear family, church, traditional values, WASP American culture, etc. Also, the ACLU defends Islam and Muslims because Islam is a negative force within the USA (Muslim culture and Western culture do not mix, clearly). The ACLU doesn't care about Muslims, they only see them as yet another tool to wreck this country and cause it to rot from within. This is why the ACLU and other leftists have cozied up to Muslims... because both the ACLU and many Muslims have a common enemy ---> the United States and, more generally, the White Western World. And let's not forget, the ACLU is primarily made up of secular Jews.
.
.

Cultural Marxism & The Subversion Of Traditional Art

2009-05-24T23:06:00.000-07:00

Compare the beautiful painting on the left (17th century Nicolas Poussin, French) to the trash on the right (Jackson Pollock, a heavily Jewish inspired American "painter"). Click on the image for a larger version.

Cultural Marxism is a Jewish movement which began in the early 20th century. It was developed for the single purpose of attacking the Western world by bringing about depraved social change to the West. One aspect of Cultural Marxism is the subversion (and perversion) of all Western cultural institutions (e.g., art, film, music, theatre, etc) in order to help cause Western societies to rot from within. In the early 20th century, so-called "Modern Art" came into existence. Talent was no longer a requirement to be an artist. One simply had to randomly slop anything on a canvas and describe the "painting" in grandiose and esoteric terms... i.e., explaining the "deep" meaning of the "art." Anyone who dared criticize the so-called "painting" was labeled "backward" and a simpleton.

In the art world today, there are NO standards. Anything goes. Anything is counted as "art." Any trash can find itself in a big city museum. It also helps if an "artist" lives a drugged-out life, stays up all night and sleeps half the day, dresses in a bizarre manner, AND, this is the most important quality, subscribes to radical leftist politics. Finally, it's important for the "artist" to constantly complain, "how the world doesn't understand me because I'm so complex."

For more on how Jews have subverted the art world, read this article in the Occidental Observer.

How To Make A White Liberal Face Their Own Racism

2009-05-23T02:05:00.000-07:00

.
Next time you meet a white liberal who praises multiculturalism and says we should "celebrate diversity", ask them the following question... "Are you a racist"? Of course they will say "NO!!" while giving you the dirtiest look imaginable. Next ask them, "OK then, if you're not a racist, tell me... would you prefer your children (i.e., WHITE children) marry another white person"? They'll typically say, "I want my kids to marry whomever they love". This is nonsense. Of course they prefer their (white) children marry another white person - it's natural. Just as blacks prefer their kids marry another black person, Asians prefer Asians, Hispanics prefer Hispanics, etc. This phenomenon is explained by Psychologist Philippe Rushton's Genetic Similarity Theory (i.e., the act of racial/ethnic preference) - it's a mild form of racism since it's a decision or preference based entirely on race/ethnicity.

If you meet a white liberal who is married, ask him/her...
"Before you got married, did you prefer to marry a white person"? They will usually say "no" followed by something like, "When I was dating, I didn't see race, I just saw the person". More liberal nonsense. About 95 out of 100 times, whites end up marrying another white person (even in racially diverse cities such as Los Angeles and New York).

If you meet a white liberal who is single, ask him/her...
"Would you prefer to marry a white person over a non-white person, if, hypothetically all characteristics were equal amongst possible mates"? When I ask this question, I find white liberals don't know what to say. Of course they would greatly prefer their ideal mate to be white, but they can't admit this due to political correctness.

The point is that EVERYONE, yes EVERYONE, is somewhat of a racist (or racial separatist). It's time we in society start to accept this. And frankly, there is nothing wrong with it. Yes, there is nothing wrong with having a personal preference to be with people who are like you, have the same ethnicity, language, culture, etc. This is why Americans in large cities tend to self-segregate into racial/ethnic neighborhoods: black neighborhoods, white neighborhoods, Korean neighborhoods, Jewish neighborhoods, Hispanic neighborhoods, Vietnamese neighborhoods, etc. Of course white multicultural enthusiasts overwhelmingly live in lily-white neighborhoods. Hypocritical? Of course.

In summary, whites overwhelmingly marry other whites and white parents always STRONGLY PREFER their children marry other whites. Blacks are the same; nearly all black parents prefer their children marry other blacks. Asians the same. Hispanics the same. And the same for Jews, in fact Jews are EXTREMELY insistent each of their children marry a Jew. All of this is normal, natural, and there is nothing wrong with it. But liberals, especially white liberals, will NEVER admit it.
.
.

Europeans - Masters Of Music

2009-05-21T14:12:00.000-07:00

.
Thank God for Europeans who gave the world a treasury of genius-inspired music, like this early 16th century composition by Frenchman Josquin Desprez. This piece epitomizes the greatness of Europe.

.
.

A Video By Dr. William Pierce Which Every White Person Should Watch

2009-05-19T01:28:00.000-07:00

.
The late Dr. William L. Pierce was a Caltech graduate, a Physics professor, & White Nationalist... a true scholar and American patriot. In this 11 part Youtube video, Dr. Pierce examines the demographic and cultural changes afflicting White America and the greater Western world.

Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 (after Part 3, the remaining parts play automatically).
.
.
.

Palestinians And Israeli-Jews To Reach Equal Numbers By 2016

2009-05-15T11:34:00.000-07:00

.
Demographics = destiny. Arab-Israelis have 3.1 times the birthrate of Jewish-Israelis. It's just a matter of time before the so-called "Jewish State" is no more. The fake, squatter "state" of "Israel" is the cancer of the Middle East. No Arab country causes even a tiny fraction of the problems caused by the warmongering ways of the Zionists. And the United States' mindless support for this parasitic leech "state" called "Israel" has done the USA tremendous damage.

Read the article here in Haaretz, an Israeli newspaper.
.
.

To All Christian Zionists: This Is What "Israel" Has Done To Jesus' Baptism Site

2009-05-12T18:28:00.000-07:00

I was recently in "Israel" where I attempted to visit Jesus' baptism site (located on the Jordan river). The site is in the Israeli-occupied West Bank (occupied since 1967). Well, the Jewish Israeli government has turned Jesus' baptism site into a minefield. How's that for respect?

You Christian supporters of "Israel" are being used. Jews mock you, laugh behind your back, and view you as "suckers" who are easy prey when it comes to fundraising for "Israel".

Click each picture for a larger image.
.
.

Political Correctness Demands That People Should Never Hate Others. But Is It Ever OK To Hate Others? Yes, If Their Actions Merit Hatred.

2009-05-11T21:08:00.000-07:00

.
In our politically correct society, when one is accused of "hate" all rational debate ends the moment such an accusation is made. The person targeted by such an accusation is deemed to be mentally pathological. Hatred, we are told, is an irrational emotion i.e., a person "hates" simply because he/she likes to "hate." Hence, any rational debate as to WHY a person hates a certain group of people is avoided. But perhaps there is good reason to hate certain people. Let's look at two groups of people whom are more than worthy of hatred.

ILLEGAL ALIENS
Anyone who is highly critical of illegal aliens is branded by the left as a "hater"; they are said to be "driven by hate and fear." But what's not to hate about illegal aliens??? They have illegally entered the United States and thus violated our sovereignty, they steal our jobs, drive down wages, engage in identity theft, use billions of our tax dollars in social services and K-12 education for their anchor babies, bankrupt many of our hospitals, drive without license & insurance, fly foreign flags, and march in our streets DEMANDING amnesty. Illegals then have the nerve to call any American who wants our immigration laws enforced a "racist" and "bigot." Given all this, it would be absurd NOT to hate illegal aliens.

ORGANIZED JEWRY (AND MOST JEWS)
Anyone who is critical of organized Jewry (or Jews in general) is said to be "driven by hatred of Jews" (i.e., so-called "anti-Semitism"). But almost nobody hates Jews simply because they are Jewish. Rather, people hate Jews and, in particular, organized Jewry because of their anti-American activism. Organized Jewry (examples include the ACLU, AJC, Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL, WJC, JDL, etc) have for decades engaged in anti-Christian, anti-White, anti-American subversive activities. Jews have historically been the backbone of the radical left. Jews are 100% responsible for opening the immigration floodgates to the 3rd world (via the 1965 immigration act), tearing down the U.S. Constitution by twisting its meaning, promoting perversion & peddling cultural filth (via Hollywood), pushing the U.S. into needless Middle East wars, and trashing America's Christian heritage. Given all this, it would be absurd NOT to hate (most) Jews, particularly organized Jewry. Are there good & decent Jews? Of course. But unfortunately most Jews (especially those part of organized Jewry) are working against the interests of the United States and thus SHOULD be hated.
.
.

How The Holocaust™ Is Used To Prevent Whites From Organizing & Expressing Their Group Interests As White People

2009-05-10T16:57:00.001-07:00

.
SYNOPSIS: Non-Whites are encouraged to organize around their various racial identities. But Whites are not allowed to do the same because Jews claim, "that leads to Nazism and another holocaust." Of course, this is absurd.

Every racial group in America is free to create organizations based on their racial identity with absolutely no social repercussions. In the United States we have black organizations, hispanic organizations, & Asian organizations... all socially acceptable. But just try to create a White-based organization and watch the gates of Hell swing open! Any attempt at creating such a group brings about the following labels: "racist", "bigot", "hater", and "Nazi."

Since World War II, the White gentile world (i.e., the Western world) has been usurped by organized Jewry. Jews control our media, politicians, banking, foreign policy (to a large extent), social agenda, & culture (through Hollywood). The long-term goal of organized Jewry is global government, which Jews plan to control. The main obstacle to global government is, collectively, all White gentile nations. This is why Jews are actively working to reduce Whites to a minority in the Western world (mostly through massive third world immigration into Western nations). In light of the demographic certainty that Whites will soon be a minority in the Western world (due to immigration), White people will naturally revolt, start organizing, and begin working for their group interests AS WHITE PEOPLE. Jews suppress White resistance to demographic trends by saying any attempt by Whites in expressing their group interests (as White people) is akin to Nazism and another potential holocaust.

Now then, we are endlessly told the holocaust is the "greatest evil in history" (it's not, there are far greater "evils" and, further, the six million number is a gross exaggeration). Nevertheless, the Western world has been thoroughly indoctrinated with holocaust propaganda for the purpose of psychologically sensitizing Whites to shy away from thinking about or feeling any pride in their White/European ancestry. Such indoctrination works in two ways, 1) it causes individual Whites to feel shame if they entertain the idea of organizing around their group interest as White people and, 2) it sensitizes society-at-large to shame and berate any White people who do attempt to organize around their White social/cultural/political interests. So #1 causes Whites to self-sensor themselves and #2 acts as the enforcement mechanism against any Whites who act in defiance of #1.

In summary, by endlessly browbeating Whites with holocaust indoctrination and "education," Jews psychologically intimidate and thus prevent most Whites from organizing around their group interests as White people.
.
.

To Young Americans: Protest Our Crooked Politicians By Not Joining The Military (if you're thinking about joining)

2009-05-04T21:24:00.000-07:00

.
- Why "serve your country" when your politicians are definitely NOT serving you in any sense?

- Why "serve your country" when your President is hell-bent on giving amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens and hell-bent on opening the floodgates to millions more Latin American peasants who will further destroy American culture, take jobs, and drive down wages?

- Why join the military when your politicians are selling this country out to greedy bankers, greedy corporations, and internationalists?

- Why join the military when your President refuses to secure our border with Mexico?

- How can there be a "war on terror" when our borders and ports have been left wide open... nearly eight years after 9/11? This fact alone clearly suggests that the "war on terror" is a scam. Iraq is primarily about oil (and doing the bidding of "Israel" which owns our Congress). It is extremely un-American to engage in a war for the purpose of getting access to another nation's resources.

The United States has been taken over by globalist elites who don't care about you and who are actively working to undermine the sovereignty of our country... why on God's Earth would you "serve your country" given all this? Don't join the military. Don't let our phony politicians use you to advance their globalist agenda. Don't be a sucker. Protest our crooked political leaders by NOT joining the military. When a military recruiter visits your high school, tell him "NO!" and cite the reasons above. Join the military when the USA is noble again, when it adheres to law and order, when it follows the Constitution, when it puts it's citizens first and not illegal aliens first, & when it doesn't engage in needless and immoral wars.
.

Political Correctness - How It's Used To Counter Critics Of Third World Immigration Into The USA

2009-05-02T17:51:00.000-07:00

.
In the early 1960's, the radical left (mostly Jews) set out to destroy the Western world as it then stood (i.e., White Christian dominated nations). In particular, the United States was their #1 target (Note: the left's agenda actually goes back 100+ years but the 1960's mark the beginning of their efforts in the modern era). Obviously the left had no military means to accomplish such a task. Instead they set out to destroy the West though demographic warfare - i.e., replacing Whites with non-Whites via massive 3rd world immigration. The left knew Whites would complain and even revolt over this onslaught from the 3rd world. To temper such predictable White revolt, the left employed the "political correctness" doctrine. The purpose of political correctness is twofold:
a
1 - Prevent Whites from complaining by intimidating them through shame and guilt (i.e., "White guilt"). The left would embark on a campaign which would constantly remind Whites of their past injustices (e.g., slavery, Native Americans, etc). For defiant Whites who still complained about non-White immigrants, the left would browbeat them with name-calling such as, "racist", "bigot", and "Nazi." Such name-calling would effectively humiliate most defiant Whites into silence. It would also act as a warning to Whites in general as to what they can expect if they dare criticize non-White immigrants (legal or illegal).
a
2 - The other end of political correctness deals with propaganda and indoctrination. Whites are told that masses of non-White immigrants are actually a good thing. As the media tells us, non-White, non-Western immigrants "enhance the human experience in the United States" and, "bring new ideas to our American culture" (Time Magazine, Feb. 1998). This is the doctrine of multiculturalism and we are lectured repeatedly on how glorious it is. American cities that are multicultural are touted as "cosmopolitan" and "sophisticated" whereas cities that are primarily White are portrayed as "backwards." As with any well-orchestrated propaganda campaign, multiculturalism has its own lexicon. Expressions such as "celebrate diversity" & "diversity is our strength" are designed not only to reduce White resistance to multiculturalism but to flip White thinking entirely i.e., towards embracing multiculturalism. Essentially then, such leftist propaganda is a method to trick Whites into embracing the very thing (i.e., multiculturalism) which will obviously lead to their demise in the West.
a
In summary, political correctness, as applied to third world immigration, is a leftist scheme (mostly Jewish driven) intended to counter Whites who object to massive non-White immigration (legal or illegal). Whites are falsely conditioned to believe that multiculturalism is a good thing and those Whites whom object are shamed into silence.
.

Conservative Americans Should Thank Hugo Chavez

2009-04-19T16:42:00.000-07:00

.
Do you care about working Americans? If yes, then please read on. For the past several years, conservative Americans have constantly berated Hugo Chavez. But does anyone realize that Hugo Chavez is indirectly doing Americans (especially working class Americans) a huge favor by acting as an obstacle towards the United States government's plans to expand NAFTA into something called the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas)?

Do you think NAFTA is bad for Americans? Well, you haven't seen anything yet. If the U.S. government gets it's way, we can "look forward" to the FTAA. Think of the FTAA as a Super-NAFTA (since the FTAA would expand NAFTA to include all Latin American countries). The FTAA will result in, over time, millions of additional Latin American peasants flooding into the USA (just as NAFTA has been a contributing factor towards Mexicans coming into the USA, though there are many other factors). Also, the FTAA would grossly undermine the sovereignty of the United States. And, of course, the FTAA would cause additional U.S. factories to close and move to Latin America where labor is dirt cheap (as in China).

Read this article:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-04/30/content_581021.htm

From the article above:
"Bolivia joined Cuba and Venezuela in the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA), an initiative promoted by Castro and Chavez in an attempt to thwart U.S. plans for the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)."

For information on the FTAA and how insidious it is:
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/CAFTA+fight+shows+can+stop+FTAA-a0135579388

For general information about the FTAA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Trade_Area_of_the_Americas

American conservatives get nervous because Hugo Chavez is a Socialist. I'm no Socialist; I'm about as far from a Socialist as one can get. But if Socialism is what the people of Venezuela want, that's their business, not ours. Further, Venezuela is no threat to the USA, in any sense. The GDP of Venezuela is a mere 1.6% the GDP of the USA. And militarily, Venezuela compared to the USA is like comparing a fly to Andre the Giant.

Kool-Aid dispensing cable shows like FOX News attack Chavez constantly. Why? Because FOX News primarily represents globalist Super-Elites, many of whom are embedded in the U.S. government (i.e., the "free" trade clowns who desperately want to see the FTAA realized). These Super-Elites see Hugo Chavez (and his Latin American allies) as an obstacle to an expanded "free" trade zone (ie. the FTAA). Any person (such as Hugo Chavez) that impedes the implementation of the FTAA should thanked by all working Americans.
.

Iran Has Called The USA, "The Great Satan"... Are We???

2009-03-31T20:47:00.000-07:00

.
Americans are usually outraged when foreign leaders criticize them. For example, the former Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, once called the USA, "the Great Satan." The "conservative" writer George Will retorted, "the United States is the paragon of morality and virtue and Khomeini should look in the mirror", a statement which reflected the sentiment felt by most Americans. But have Americans looked at America lately? Is America a moral and virtuous nation? No, we are not. In fact, we are a decadent, immoral country. Let's look at the depraved modern day America. The following is a sampling of the problems with U.S. culture/society...

- A society which has the highest teen pregnancy rate in West.

- A society in which public schools freely distribute condoms and birth control pills, in some cases to middle school students (11 - 13 years old).

- A society which has the highest birth-out-of-wedlock rate in the West.

- A society in which 38% of American children are raised in single parent households.

- A society which has one of the highest divorce rates in West (about 52% of marriages end in divorce).

- A society which has an abundance of hardcore pornography (gay, straight, bi, transsexual, anything goes... no limits).

- A society which has openly gay-friendly cities.

- A society in which gay marriage is allowed in certain states.

- A society which was the primary incubator of AIDS due to rampant American homosexual promiscuity (a deviant sexuality which is "celebrated" by U.S. mainstream media).

- A society in which hundreds of thousands of abortions (i.e., murders) are performed each year.

- A society in which people dump their aging parents in old age homes (caring for their parents would interfere with their "career").

- A culture which promotes "outsourcing" of child raising to day care centers so the mother can pursue her "career."

- A culture in which sex-out-of-wedlock is completely the norm.

- A culture in which having ten or more sex partners before marriage is very common and even acceptable.

- A society which has the highest violent crime rates of any first world country (including many thousands of murders per year).

- A society which has approximately 1.2 million hard core violent gang members roaming our streets.

- A society whose popular culture (via TV, film, and pop music) is dominated by immoral filth.

- A society which has the highest illicit drug use rate in the Western world.

- A society which feeds off the slave labor of the 3rd world so it can have excesses of materialism.

- A government which is thoroughly corrupt on all levels: federal, state, county, and municipal gov'ts. Politically, the United States is, "government of the highest bidder" i.e., highest campaign contributors.

The United States lost the bulk of its morality beginning sometime in the early 1960's. Maybe Iran is correct, maybe we have become "the Great Satan."

NOTE: In the above, I point out the USA's immorality with regard to domestic/cultural matters. Regarding foreign policy, our immoral, war-mongering ways are another Satanic-like characteristic of the United States.
.

Organized Jewry Is Responsible For Multicultural America

2009-03-21T19:32:00.000-07:00

.
In 1965 America was 90.5% white, 7.5% black, & 2% other. The 1965 Immigration Act changed all that "thanks" to organized Jewish efforts. Today America is only 65% white (and this percentage is falling each year). By 2040, whites will be below 50% of the U.S. population.

Do you love multicultural America? I don't. Although I enjoy traveling around the world and experiencing different cultures, I clearly understand that multiculturalism is a recipe for disaster... a recipe for inevitable conflict (especially when immigrants are encouraged NOT to assimilate, as is the case in the U.S.). Who can we "thank" for this demographic shift? Who??? Organized Jewry, that's who. Read this article (click here) for an explanation as to why Jews have historically lobbied so hard for open borders, amnesty for illegals, and unlimited 3rd world non-white immigration into the USA. Another great article on this subject is here.

.

Jewish Man Who Converted To Christianity Exposes Anti-America Agenda Of Jews

2009-03-08T18:40:00.000-07:00

.

Nathanael Kapner is Jewish by birth but converted to Christianity. He runs a website in which he exposes the sinister Jewish agenda of attacking White-Christian America. His website is:
http://www.realjewnews.com/

This is a particularly interesting article from his site:
How Jews wrote & lobbied hard for the 1965 immigration bill (which turned America into a multicultural nation, just as the jews hoped for):
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=50
.

Illegal Aliens Complain About Whites Moving Into The Echo Park Section Of Los Angeles

2009-03-07T16:32:00.000-08:00

.
The nerve of these illegal alien squatters, complaining about Whites moving back to the Echo Park section of Los Angeles. Echo Park was 95% White up until the late 1960's which is when hispanics started moving in and trashing the area: gangs, graffiti, litter, demands for bilingual education, welfare & food stamps leeches, etc. Hispanics complain that Whites currently moving into the Echo Park section of L.A. are not "culturally sensitive" to hispanics. Well, that's interesting because let's ask just how "culturally sensitive" hispanics were to the 95% White population of Echo Park back in the late 1960s? Back then, hispanics quickly opened taco shops, Mexican bakeries, Spanish-only shops, etc - transforming Echo Park into "Little Mexico" by the early 1980s.

.
.

This Is The Problem...

2009-02-21T12:06:00.000-08:00

Why Are Jews Seen As Weak People?

2009-02-09T16:06:00.000-08:00

.
Jews are viewed as weak because they constantly play "victim". Strong people rise above notions of victimhood. Most people have far too much pride and dignity to play "victim". But Jews incessantly whine about so-called "anti-semitism" and endlessly remind the world of their alleged suffering (ie. the "holocaust"). Jews essentially are saying, "feel sorry for us... we suffered". Do strong people want others to feel sorry for them? Of course not.

Roughly 55 million people died during WWII, but do you hear any other group of people whining like Jews do? No. Approximately 20 million Russians died in that war... do you hear Russians crying like children in search of sympathy? Hardly. Russians have far too much self-respect to complain the way Jews do. Russians understand that complaining and playing up "victimhood" is a sure sign of weakness. On May 9th of each year, Russia holds a quiet and dignified ceremony to honor the 20 million dead Russians (WWII casualties). Few people around the world know about this ceremony - just the way Russians prefer it.

Any little thing said about Jews/Israel/the holocaust which does not follow the Jewish sanctioned view is viewed as an "attack" upon Jews. Jews then whine on TV, in newspapers, hold press conferences and demand an apology. What other group of people carry on the way Jews do? None. Jews can take no criticism; a sure sign of a weak people. One wonders if and when Jews will every get some dignity and stop playing the "victim" game?
.

Next Time Blacks Talk About So-Called "White Privilege", Remind Them Of Indentured Servitude (ie. The Enslaving Of White Immigrants)

2009-01-23T13:34:00.000-08:00

.
Next time blacks talk about so-called "White privilege", remind them of indentured servitude, ie. the widespread practice of enslaving Whites in colonial America and continuing through the early 20th century.

Short article on White indentured servants in America (and early Britain):
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html

"One half to two thirds of all immigrants [from Europe] to Colonial America arrived as indentured servants. At times, as many as 75% of the population of some colonies were under terms of indenture."

"In theory, the person is only selling his or her labor. In practice however, indentured servants were basically slaves and the courts enforced the laws that made it so. The treatment of the servant was harsh and often brutal. In fact, the Virginia Colony prescribed 'bodily punishment for not heeding the commands of the master'."
.
.

COMING SOON: "Crossing Over" Starring Harrison Ford (A Pro-Illegal Alien Film) - Made By... Who Else?? Jews, The Enemy Of White-Christian America.

2009-01-19T19:53:00.000-08:00

.
"Crossing Over" starring Harrison Ford, coming to a theatre near you in 2009. Another glorious contribution by Jews (the Weinstein brothers and written by Wayne Kramer, another Jew). This film is pure liberal, open borders propaganda. Watch the trailer and you'll throw up:

Film overview/credits:
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809837407/info

Take close note of how these Jew producers/writer muddy the illegal immigration debate by showing White (Irish) illegals. What percentage of illegals in America are White??? What percentage are Hispanic? It's 10,000 to 1 (Hispanic to White).
Do you think these Jews live anywhere near Hispanic illegals? Of course not. Do you think these Jews will send their kids to a school overrun with Hispanic anchor babies... you know, one of those schools with armed guards and where half the students drop out? Of course not. These Jews live in nice, safe, wealthy gated communities and hence they certainly won't be impacted by what they are promoting (ie. open borders, amnesty)... that's for everyone else to deal with.
The goal of organized Jewry and Jewish media elites is, and has been for the past 80 years or so, to reduce Whites in America to a minority, to turn America into a "multicultural" nation so that Jews then become just another minority. All this comes at the expense of the majority White population of America. Organized Jewry* and Jewish media elites... the cancer of America.

* organized Jewry includes: ACLU, ADL, Simon Weisenthal Center, JDL, World Jewish Congress, B'nai B'rith, AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center), to name a few.
.

Mexican-Americans Blame Their Failures On U.S. "Oppression"... But Why Are Asians So Successful In America?

2008-12-30T22:49:00.000-08:00

.
Illegal Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans (ie. citizens) living in the USA are economically the lowest ethnic group in America. They have the lowest education levels, the highest high school dropout rate, the lowest savings rate, the lowest home ownership rate, & the lowest average income. Most U.S. hispanic neighborhoods are rife with gangs, crime, graffiti, low property values, lack of business investment, etc. Generation after generation, nothing improves in U.S. hispanic neighborhoods. Some examples include East Los Angeles, Corona/Queens New York City, South Chicago, many areas of Phoenix & Tuscon, etc. We see the pattern repeated in communities now being inundated with Mexicans: Denver, Atlanta, Washington DC, Portland, Indianapolis, etc. In each of these cities, we see that when Mexicans move in, the neighborhood they move into suffers: gangs, graffiti, trash, poverty, etc. Mexicans always blame their lack of standing on "American oppression". They say Americans are holding them down "because of White racism".

Racism??? Really??? But what about Asians????
If White Americans are so racist, why is it that Asian immigrants are so successful in the USA? Asians have dark skin, different eye appearance, and their culture/language is radically different from American culture/language. Hence, shouldn't White Americans "oppress" Asians even more than they supposedly "oppress" Mexicans??? Many Asians came to the USA as refuges... so-called "boat people" from Vietnam, Cambodia, & Laos. Yet when one visits, for example, a heavily Vietnemese neighborhood in America (central Orange County, CA for example) one finds a clean & respectable community. The Vietnemse value education highly and they often attend the most presigious U.S. universities. The same holds for, say, Koreans and Chinese living in the USA. Thousands of Chinese slip into the USA illegally every year by hiding in shipping containers which cross the Pacific Ocean. Decades ago, Chinese did experience discrimination in the USA, but that has largely changed. Chinese now flourish in the USA.
Many Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII but that was decades ago; it's a different America today as so-called "racism" and discrimination are, for the most part, relics of the past. Japanese now flourish in America. Learning English when one speaks Chinese, Korean, or Japanese is extremely difficult, far more difficult than learning English when one speaks Spanish. Yet why do we never hear, for example, "Press 2 for Chinese"???
Why do Asian immigrants view affirmative action as a personal insult and yet Mexicans complain that we need more affirmative action programs AND quotas must be raised to allow more hispanics to attend college. Asians certainly don't need affirmative action, and frankly, Asians are (in some fields) higher academic achievers than White Americans. Boy oh boy, we White Americans sure are "oppressive" towards those Asians!! Looking at California, Asians only make up 12% of California's population but represent 34% of the prestigious University of California student body. Hispanics make up a whopping 38% of California's population (most of them are Mexican-Americans) yet they only represent 8% of the UC student body. There are endless statistics like this and they are simple enough to look up.
The reality is that Mexican culture isn't upwardly mobile & it doesn't value education in the same way that Asian culture does. All the opportunities exist in this country for success; Mexicans ignore the opportunities while Asians see them as a gift.

For information on hispanic "family values":
http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_4_hispanic_family_values.html

For information on hispanic's disinterest in education, refer to these two books:
http://www.amazon.com/Clipping-Their-Own-Wings-Incompatibility/dp/0761835369
http://www.amazon.com/One-Nation-Standard-Ex-Liberal-Hispanics/dp/159523019X
a
.

Secular Jews Are Repeating Mistakes Of The Past And Thus Becoming The Most Hated Group In The USA

2008-12-06T00:02:00.000-08:00

.
Though Jews represent only about 2% of the USA's population (secular Jews are about 80% of all American Jews), they are doing immeasurable damage to America by undermining its core values, basic principles, Christian majority beliefs and practices, right to sovereignty and secure borders, right to national unity and singular culture, and right to enforce current immigration laws against illegal aliens.

Through their actions and relentless activism in the areas of legislation, journalism, and popular media/culture, many secular Jews are quickly creating tens of millions of WASP American enemies. Over the past 80 years, Jews have increasingly gained a reputation of being American deconstructionists, hence anti-American. Unfortunately, it seems Jews haven't heeded lessons of their past mistakes. They inhabit an area and quickly infuriate the natives through their activism against the natives' ideals, culture, and creed. As a result, they are persecuted. This pattern has repeated itself for thousands of years. The latest chapter sees this happening in the United States.

SECULAR AMERICAN JEWS AND THEIR SUPPORT FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
In light of the current raging national debate regarding illegal aliens, the vast majority of American Jews have sided with illegal aliens. Their siding with illegal aliens is not a passive one. Its a highly aggressive... a legal, journalistic, and popular media assault against all Americans who simply want current immigration laws enforced, want illegal aliens deported, and want America's borders secured. It should be noted there are a handful of Jews fully against illegal immigration (a few radio talk show hosts, for example), but the vast majority of secular American Jews are clearly on the side of illegal aliens. They fight for illegals' so-called "rights" with tenacious, relentlessly passion. Regardless of the fact that massive immigration into the USA from Latin American 3rd world countries will no doubt destroy the current way of life in America, Jews press on and push for amnesty for illegal aliens along with open borders, thus enabling tens of millions more 3rd world people to flood into the USA.

SECULAR AMERICAN JEWS AND THEIR ASSAULT ON CHRISTIANITY
The majority of lawyers working for anti-American organizations like the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center are secular Jews. Their insane obsession with removing all religious (specifically Christian) references in public spaces is not motivated by a simple desire to be true to the Constitution's notion of so-called church/state separation. Rather their motivation is to de-Christianize America. They began this assault in earnest during the latter half of the last century by first attacking religious icons and religious text in public spaces. With each passing year, we see their attacks more brazen and outrageous.

SECULAR AMERICAN JEWS AND THEIR ASSAULT ON TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES
Secular Jews are the most prominent force in Hollywood/popular culture, mass media, and every form of journalism. Through their domination they have, year by year, incrementally taken steps towards transforming American culture from innocence to decadence. Jews have used the immeasurable power of TV, film, and popular music as tools towards shaping (lowering) American moral standards, attitudes, values, and beliefs ie. poisoning American culture. The vast majority of damage has been done during the past 50 years. In this short time, American popular culture has gone from "Father Knows Best" to "Sex and the City", from the innocence of "Marty" (best picture 1955) to hard core pornography, from The Andrew Sisters to violent gangsta rap. With each succeeding year, decency standards are "advanced" towards immoral filth, all under the political cover of "Freedom of Expression" and the exercise of First Amendment rights.
Society's degradation has naturally followed the degradation of popular culture, as evidenced by: historically high divorce rates, more children born out of wedlock than ever before, rampant adultery, promiscuity reaching the status of normal behavior, skyrocketing teen pregnancy, out of control crime (especially in large urban areas), and widespread drug use.

In summary, many secular American Jews are working against America, the country which gave them refuge; the country where capitalism and freedom allowed Jews to flourish and often rise to the top of American society.
a
.

Europe Will Let In 50 Million Poor Africans

2008-10-16T20:46:00.000-07:00

.
The globalist masters aren't wasting any time tearing down Europe via demographic warfare by way of massive immigration.

TACTIC ----------> DEMOGRAPHIC WARFARE
TARGET --------> WHITE WESTERN NATIONS
COVER STORY ---------> "We need these immigrants to sustain our economy"

50 million poor, largely unskilled Africans will be allowed to immigrate to the EU under the phony guise of "economic necessity" (of course these African immigrants will instantly be eligible for EU welfare benefits thus making them a financial burden to the State). Meanwhile, passive Europeans are largely silent for fear of being called "racists", "xenophobes", "bigots", or "nativists".......... Europeans' passiveness and fear is the result of decades of politically correct indoctrinaton.

Article: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/65628/Secret-plot-to-let-50million-African-workers-into-EU

ASIDE: Void of an army, globalist elites simply destroy a country (or an entire continent) by flooding it with tens of millions of poor immigrants, telling them NOT to assimilate, and instilling in them hatred for the White majority. Further, elites encourage such immigrants to demand their "rights". Lastly, elites tell the immigrants they are "victims" and "oppressed" peoples (of course all their "oppression" is caused by "evil" Whites).

That's the formula globalist elites are using to tear down Europe, Austalia, New Zealand, Canada, and the USA.

Regardless of who wins the U.S election, Obama or McCain, you'll see an amnesty + a massive "guest" worker program proposed which is (of course) designed to inflict demographic warfare on the United States.
a
.

Thank White People

2008-10-02T19:31:00.000-07:00

.
Thank White people for:

- That computer you're typing on
- The software that drives your computer
- The Internet & nearly all web applications
- Recorded music
- Motion picture
- TV
- Radio
- Camera
- Telephone
- Light bulb
- Automobile
- Rocketry (modern)
- Satellite
- Spacecraft
- Airplane
- Skyscraper
- Telescope
- Printing press
- Eyeglasses
- Contact lenses
- Microwave oven
- Metallurgy (most discoveries and methods)
- Materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics)
- 95% of medical advancements
- 95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs
- Modern food preservatives
- Most scientific breakthroughs over the past 1000 years
- The bulk of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology
- Astronomy (most discoveries and mapping techniques)
- Sea navigation (most advancements)
- Discovery of DNA
- Genetics (most research)
- Microscope
- Laser technology and its myriad of uses
- Harnessing electricity
- Nuclear energy
- Wireless technology
- Air conditioning devices
- Refrigeration
- Modern agricultural techniques
- Modern democracy

Where would the world be without White people? Stuck in the stone age, that's where. So the next time you get in your car, pick up your cell phone, fly in a plane, etc. thank White people.a

.
.

Massive 3rd World Immigration Into White Western Nations = Tool Of Global Elite To Break Apart The West

2008-09-27T15:15:00.000-07:00

.
Massive 3rd world immigration into white Western nations (ie. multiculturalism) is a tool the global elite have been using to slowly break apart white Western nations. Ethnic/racial balkanization always results when different "tribes" occupy the same land. A cursory look at the last 6,000 years of recorded history proves this. The global elite know that multiculturalism will tear any nation apart from within, which is exactly why they have been pushing multiculturalism for the past 50 years on the West. The global elite want a one world gov't and Western nations stand as the #1 obstacle to this goal, this is why the elite set out some 50 years ago to destroy the West. They have no army to do so and hence they use massive 3rd world immigration to achieve this goal. Combined with massive immigration is a slick public relations campaign with slogans like, "diversity is our strength", "celebrate diversity", etc. All nonsense. Diversity is a weakness, a cancer... history proves this.

Don't be fooled into believing multiculturalism is a strength. The truth is that whites are being targeted. Have you ever noticed that it's only white nations which are subjected to massive immigration and who must henceforth "celebrate diversity"?? Do you hear about diversity campaigns in Japan, China, Middle Eastern countries, African countries, etc.????? Never.

In closing I will say that I am curious about the world and it's different cultures, but that doesn't mean I want to bring the world's various cultures to settle in the United States! I am keenly aware that mixing endless numbers of cultures/ethnicities/etc in the same nation will always lead to a fractured society and will eventually lead to violent conflict. History proves this.
.
a

Jewish Influence Seen On N-400 Form

2008-08-04T20:44:00.000-07:00

.
Click on image for larger version...

Here we see yet another example of how Jews influence the U.S. government. Why single out Nazi Germany on the N-400 form (ie. naturalization application)? Was the USA attacked by Germany? No. Why not mention the other Axis powers: Imperial Japan & Italy? Japan attacked us, not Germany. Why focus on WWII? How about other wars the U.S. was engaged in?

Liberals Are Unknowingly Working Against The U.S. Labor Class

2008-07-10T17:24:00.000-07:00

.
Liberals who support illegal immigrants are actually (unknowingly) siding with greedy U.S. corporations. Why? Because they (ie. liberals) are (unknowingly) protecting corporate America's cheap labor pool.

WHO WINS? Greedy companies AND illegal workers (earning FAR more than what they earned in whichever Latin American country they are from).

WHO LOSES? The U.S. labor class (U.S. "proletariat") via job losses to illegal workers & depressed wages.

Thus 122 years of U.S. labor struggle (carried out since the Haymarket Rebellion of 1886) is being undermined, just as corporations like it.

But liberals claim they want to legalize all so-called "undocumented workers" and then unionize them along with American citizens in specific industries (eg. meat packing, construction, hotel maids, fast food, etc). First, this solves nothing because of something called labor saturation (ie. too many workers for too few jobs). Labor saturation always benefits employers, presence of a union or not. Second, it's extremely unfair to ask Americans to join forces (in a union) with newly amnestied illegals. Why should Americans have to compete with border jumpers? Americans working in the above mentioned industries, even if unionized, would suffer lower pay (ie. wage depression). How so? An employer would be able to negotiate lower wages in such a labor saturated situation - labor saturation weakens a union's bargaining ability since the possibility of "scabs" is very real with too many workers and not enough jobs.

What American worker would entertain the idea of forming such a "liberal utopia" union? Few would. Why should they? But suppose such a union was indeed formed. What would happen? The hispanic wing of the union (made up of recently amnestied hispanics) would be the union's weak link. Since most of these people are from Mexico or another Latin American country, they're used to a lower standard of living (compared to American workers). Thus, they would be more willing (vs the American workers) to vote for a "low ball" wage offer from management. This amounts to wage depression for the American workers in the union.

Finally, in addition to amnesty, liberals insist on open borders, allowing for an endless stream of new cheap labor workers. Do liberals intend to amnesty and unionize these new arrivals? Yes. And that leads to EVEN MORE labor saturation. Even Cesar Chavez recognized the insanity of amnesty and open borders when he said, "the enemy of organized labor is illegal labor, and the endless supply of it".

a